The mainstream corporate press has
been full of stories about how Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic
nomination for president is failing, she’s being investigated for storing
classified emails on a non-secure computer server, Bernie Sanders is gaining on
her in the polls, and Joe Biden is tantalizing us with the prospect of running
himself. There are also rumors that
Obama is not turning over his campaign staff or donor records etc. to the
Hillary Clinton campaign.
What on earth is all this about?
The thing that you must never forget,
is that the mainstream corporate press is not a free press, but a propaganda
machine run to a tight script that is generated by maybe fewer than a dozen
people who mostly all play golf with each other. Negative stories about Hillary Clinton don't
just magically appear on CNN or FOX news, unless the right people have approved
them first.
Hillary Clinton’s husband, Bill,
performed yeoman service to his wealthy patrons in selling out the national
interest for money. Hillary herself is
nothing if not joined at the hip with Wall Street, and – empty campaign slogans
aside – has always come down on the side of the super-rich against the
interests of the middle class. From her
support of anti-worker anti-American trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPP,
cheap-labor immigration policies, letting Wall Street loot the public treasury,
etc.etc., she’s been a reliably corrupt grifter.
So from the point of view of the
0.01%, what’s not to like?
If the real players in our society
liked Hillary, you would not be hearing this negative press – it would all be
sunshine and sparkles, her utterly dishonest press releases about wanting to
help the middle class given uncritical glowing exposure by a sycophantic corporate press. The executive branch is now almost
utterly lawless – look at how the nation’s immigration laws are increasingly
being flat-out broken. If the people in
charge wanted the business of the classified state department emails to go
away, they would go away and you and I would never have heard of them. But why?
Of course I don’t really know. But it must be for a reason, and we can
speculate.
1.
Hillary don’t golf.
Bill Clinton and Barack Obama always spent a lot of time golfing and
palling it up with their wealthy patrons.
And just as Charley don’t surf, Hillary don’t golf. I have also heard strong rumors that, in
person, Hillary can be a real nasty piece of work. So some of this might just be personal – the
old boy network doesn’t like her. Still,
the old boys know that business is business, and if they felt that Hillary
would be the best agent to advance their agenda I’m sure they could swallow
their personal dislike of her.
But on the other hand, it might be
more than personal dislike – by not playing golf and schmoozing in general, the
oligarchs might wonder if they are really all on the same team. It could be a trust issue, which leads me to:
2.
Hillary is not playing by the rules. The game according to Bill Clinton and Barack
Obama is this: you lie through your teeth during the campaign about wanting to
help the middle class and the poor. Then
when elected you dutifully serve the interests of the super-rich while totally
screwing over the nation as a whole.
Then, AFTER leaving office, you cash in.
That’s how it’s done.
But Hillary isn’t going along with
this. As Secretary of State she spent a
lot (maybe most?) of her time making deals selling out the national interest to
enrich herself and her family and foundation.
WHILE STILL SECRETARY OF STATE.
Now, the rich don’t give a damn about public figures selling out for
money – hey, it’s how the rich keep getting richer, because they can outbid the
rest of the nation for the services of government officials. But, Hillary was not a good little
servant. She acted like she was already
a major player – she was looking to advance her own interests up front, instead
of advancing the interests of the oligarchy and then getting paid off.
This must worry a lot of the people in
charge. What really will Hillary do if she gets her hands on the increasingly
unchecked power of the US presidency?
Will she do as she’s told, or will she try to grab everything for herself
and her foundation and step on a lot of powerful toes? That must worry the people with powerful toes.
And then there is the feminism angle. The elites are happy to let little people deal with affirmative action and racial and gender quotas and squabble amongst each other for scraps, but these agendas are not to ever ever apply to the elite, who remain mostly rich white men. Could Hillary apply gender quotas to the real players here? That would not do. Such things are only for little people.
3.
Obama must be starting to sweat. In the old days of
the US constitutional republic, presidents would retire and live out their
lives in peace. In dictatorships, that
doesn’t happen – executives with absolute power don’t typically retire
willingly, because if they do they are always going to be a potential threat to
their successors. Thus, retired/deposed
dictators tend to be assassinated/jailed/investigated/executed etc.
Now Congress has increasingly signed
away it’s power to the executive branch, and the judiciary has become little
more than a rubber stamp that will approve anything as long as national
security or executive privilege is invoked.
So the president can start and continue to fight wars all over the
planet almost without restraint, can spend billions undermining foreign
governments, can sign binding treaties without 2/3 congressional approval, can
completely make up immigration law out of who cloth, can arrest and imprison US
citizens indefinitely without charge, can classify any piece of information,
can freeze anyone’s bank accounts on a whim, can refuse to enforce any law, he
can lock down entire city centers so his rich banker friends can throw a party….
you get the idea.
So what happens when Obama retires,
and Hillary gets all that power? Maybe
she’ll play nice. Or maybe she
won’t. The point is that once Obama
steps down, and Hillary steps up, Obama will give up all that power. Oh, he’ll still have powerful friends, but
they will have other issues to attend to than protecting Obama, and Hillary
will have all the leverage. If she
wanted to, she could investigate him on any number of obscure violations of the
federal code real and imagined, she could make his life hell. Is there any bad blood between Obama and
Hillary? Is she still bitter about
2008? Payback’s a bitch, and so's Hillary.
Or maybe it’s more of a turf war – Hillary
could suck up so many donations into the Clinton foundation that Obama’s
competing foundational power center could be left gasping for oxygen.
Either way, Obama would sleep a lot
easier knowing that team-player Joe “The Senator from Mastercard” Biden was in
charge. Biden is a moronic mean-spirited gaffe-monster,
but he knows enough to do as he’s told.
5.
The Republicans might not be following the script. What the rich really want is that, come
election day, the American public has a heads-the-rich-win
tails-the-workers-lose choice. Hillary vs. Jeb, Hillary vs. Rubio, it’s all
good. One sometimes hears complaints
about those high-priced campaign consultants (like Karl Rove) that lost a lot
of elections but still keep getting paid big bucks. They didn’t lose. They played their part in stage managing a
false campaign where the rich won. So of
course they keep getting paid – where it really counts, they keep winning!
Now the Democrats have an edge over
the Republicans, in that their base is completely demoralized and adrift from any
sense of sanity. Obama can stab them in
the back time and again, and liberal democrats will continue to support him and
whine that it’s all those evil Republicans fault for having a divided Congress
(as if Congress even mattered any more, and when it does – like the vote for
Obamatrade – Congress rapidly falls into line).
The Republican base, however, is still in some measure of contact with
reality. When a politician campaigns one
way and then, after being elected, does the opposite, the base gets angry.
So if it were Hillary vs. Trump or
Hillary vs. Santorum, the rich won’t sweat it.
The Republican party will fight amongst themselves, as
oligarchy-approved forces battle it out with the grass roots. So Hillary would automatically get the
Democratic vote: a Trump or a Santorum would be so slandered in the mainstream
press and attacked from all sides, that they would be lucky to poll more than
40% in the general election.
But what if Trump (against all odds,
I’m still not very optimistic) manages to pull it off? What if he actually makes headway with black
voters, that hey, all these bad trade agreements and illegal and legal
immigration are stealing your jobs? And
ditto with many American citizens of Latin American descent? And what if the slanders that he’s a racist
make him not weaker, but even stronger?
This might not spin out the way the rich want after all.
And if Trump ends up running against Bernie Sanders... well... all bets are off.
6.
So is Biden the oligarchies’ backup plan? As I said before, Biden is a disgusting
nonentity of human being. But he’s a
proven team player, and won’t shaft Obama after the latter retires. Look for sycophantic press coverage – nonstop
pushing about how he’s the champion of the American worker (barf) how his son
begged him to run for president on his deathbed (did Spielberg script that
one?), that he’s got the “Joe-mentum”, etc.
Never underestimate how the rich can
take someone with zero percent in the polls and, with constant manufactured
press coverage, push them to the front.
That happened with Bill Clinton, and John McCain, and Barack Obama – all
going nowhere until the deal was struck.
So don’t laugh, Biden for president could happen.
And watch the Republican side as
well. If the rich can find a more pliable ‘outsider’ who talks pretty
in public but promises to betray the nation when elected, such a person will
get a lot of glowing press. Yes I am thinking of you, Ben Carson. Carson is surfing on the anti-establishment vibe, but if you look at his website and listen to his press releases, he's effectively for unlimited illegal cheap-labor immigration. I read a lot on his site about abortion and keeping 'gitmo' open, but nada about all these anti-American trade deals, or how hedge fund managers are being taxed less than truck drivers etc. Sounds to me like Mr. Carson is toeing the big-money establishment line. Rile the proles up with social issues and let the big money continue to rip us off.
Beware of ‘outsiders’ saying what you want to hear, that are somehow not being slandered as racist far-right goons.
Beware of ‘outsiders’ saying what you want to hear, that are somehow not being slandered as racist far-right goons.
If they can’t beat Trump directly,
they can try to wear him down with slander and deflect the anger of the
American people with a more acceptable ‘outsider’. Watch for it.
Remember how good Obama sounded in
2008? Well, don’t forget how that ended up.
No comments:
Post a Comment