A wit recently said that ‘racist’ has
replaced ‘communist’ as the new swear word of the establishment. A case in point is that any talk of the
effect of rapid population growth on pushing down wages or harming the environment
is inevitably met with screams of ‘racist’.
But it’s all rubbish.
It is an established fact of economics
that, for societies without an open frontier, rapid population growth causes
poverty for the many and riches for the few.
This is agreed upon by both classical and Keynesian economics, and up
until about 1970 was the consensus view of all mainstream economists.
However, the rich want profits for
themselves, and if that means that there must by poverty for the many, well,
nothing personal, strictly business. But
saying that the rich want to increase the population to drive down wages sounds
bad, so the rich have waged a massive propaganda campaign to convince people
that rapid population growth cannot ever be anything than an unalloyed
good. To this end they have used lies
and misdirection and tortured logic such that the sanest person’s head would
spin. But on top of that, they
reflexively slander all opposed to overpopulation as ‘racist’.
An example of this process is the
environmental organization the Sierra Club.
Now the Sierra Club used to stand against rapid population growth, for
the simple reason that rapid population growth is a major cause of
environmental damage. Then a wealthy
rentier with an arguable stake in cheap labor spent $100 million dollars to
bribe (IMHO) the leadership of the Sierra Club into changing their position,
and instead insisting that rapid population growth has no effect on the
environment – and anyone who says differently is a racist (check out http://www.susps.org/).
A key point is the Sierra Club did not
change its position because of new data, or a reasoned debate. The Sierra Club changed its position because
the leadership had been paid to do so. I
don’t mean to pick on the Sierra Club, it’s just that usually this process is
veiled in secrecy, and operates quietly as wealthy donors only bestow their
largess on those who – wittingly or not – will support their selfish interests.
The Neoliberals and their running dogs
in the media (I love the phrase ‘running dog’ and have always wanted to use it
in a sentence!) have so confused and confounded public discourse that today
even the most intelligent and skeptical person cannot hope to see through all of their deceptions. No sane person
can be skeptical of everything all at once, and most of what we believe is
inherited via herd instinct from what we have been told in school and what we read in the
mass media and what our friends and colleagues say. Thus the toxic meme that any talk of rapid
population growth being bad is de facto evidence of racism has permeated the
so-called liberal community until by now they no more think about it than a fish
does water.
But on the other hand there are some
real racists out there, but, perversely, they are applauded as saints! I refer to the corporate-sponsored Hispanic
racists who demand that they should only care about people of their ‘raza’
(‘For the race, everything, outside of the race, nothing’. I am not making this stuff up). They insist that they care nothing about
their fellow citizens who are white, black, yellow or red – only their precious
raza. Indeed, they don’t even care about
individual Americans of Latin American origin (whose prospects will be harmed
by massive third-world immigration just as surely as Americans of other races
will be), but only the aggregate power of their raza. Their single goal is to massively increase
the numbers of Hispanics so that their raza will have more power relative to
other races. It’s like Hispanics are a
species of xenophobic insects from a bad science fiction novel aimed at
conquering the galaxy. Now that’s racism
you can believe in!
Of course, most Americans with Latin
American ancestors are as skeptical about jamming a billion people into the
United States as any other American, but that’s not the script. Thus the corporate press constantly hammers
home the false idea that Hispanics care only about importing more of their kind,
and that if Republicans are to win the racist Hispanic vote they must support
them in opening the borders to an unlimited number of foreign nationals and
driving wages down to sub-poverty levels so that Mark Zuckerberg can get even
richer. Surely only a racist of the
vilest sort could object?
Remember that 'Hispanic' is a completely artificial term that was created out of whole cloth by the rich to divide and conquer the American people, and to try and create a sector of the American populace that will be an ally in their efforts to drive down wages by opening the border. For some time this was a myth, hammered home on the pages of the New York TImes but not believed by most so-called 'Hispanics' (who in earlier times were referred to as 'white'). But this long pretense may finally create its own reality. Goodbye melting pot, hello civil strife.
Remember that 'Hispanic' is a completely artificial term that was created out of whole cloth by the rich to divide and conquer the American people, and to try and create a sector of the American populace that will be an ally in their efforts to drive down wages by opening the border. For some time this was a myth, hammered home on the pages of the New York TImes but not believed by most so-called 'Hispanics' (who in earlier times were referred to as 'white'). But this long pretense may finally create its own reality. Goodbye melting pot, hello civil strife.
If you are one of those species of
liberals that insist that opposition to open borders is racist, and you have
made it this far, I congratulate you. I
humbly suggest that for the American people to only want to moderate the rate
at which foreign nationals be allowed to settle in the United States be
moderated, to a level that does not depress wages or increase crowding, is
totally reasonable. I also suggest that
whenever the press talks about ‘immigrants’, you replace the word with ‘foreign
national’. Americans have nothing
against immigrants – many US citizens are of course immigrants – the issue is
entirely about foreign nationals (who have their own countries thank you very
much) and how many should be let in each year.
Opposition to a too-high level of immigration is arguably nationalistic
(perhaps, dare one say it, patriotic), but it is clearly not racist or even
xenophobic.
Instead, I suggest that whenever you
hear the word ‘Hispanic’ mentioned in public discourse, that you replace it
with ‘Hispanic racist’. It is, after all,
only the truth. And the truth is in such
short supply that we should produce it whenever we have the chance.
Corporate-sponsored Hispanic racists. Racism you can believe in!
No comments:
Post a Comment